Spatially resolved inventory and emissions modelling for pea and lentil life cycle assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulses are an increasingly popular source of plant-based protein among food manufacturers, food service providers, and retailers globally. Canada is currently a global leader in pulse production and exports. Given the large geographical scope of their production within Canada, pulses are produced under a variety of conditions reflecting differences in soil, climate, and characteristic management practices. In order to understand the influence of regional factors on the impacts of pulse production, high-resolution, regionalized life cycle assessments (LCAs) were carried out using both region-specific input/output data and emissions modelling. Six hundred Canadian pea and lentil farmers were surveyed to collect detailed data regarding characteristic farm inputs, yields and management practices at the reconciliation unit level of spatial resolution, which reconciles Canadian provincial borders with terrestrial ecozones based on soil and climate factors. The process-based model DeNitrification DeComposition (DNDC) was used to estimate regionally specific N emissions. This was compared to emissions estimates generated using the IPCC Tier II empirical models, which are typically used to estimate greenhouse gas emissions for national inventory reports. The main contributors to the life cycle environmental impacts of pea and lentil production were fertilizer and fuel use. This was consistent across all levels of regional aggregation including the total Prairie province average, as well as ecozone and provincial levels. There was variation in the magnitude of the impacts in each region assessed, which was mainly attributable to differences in yield, as well as reported fertilizer application rates and related emissions and fuel use for field operations. Significant differences were found in N emissions estimates between the DNDC and IPCC models, the magnitude of which varied by region and by the N emissions model employed. DNDC was found to provide better-resolved emissions estimates at the ecozone scale. This demonstrates the relevance of regionally specific emissions modelling since local soil and climate conditions had a large impact on the emissions estimates. In addition, the levels of uncertainty in the models were generally higher at the provincial and prairie province scale than at the ecozone scale. This may indicate that farming practices and associated resource/environmental impacts are more strongly influenced by soil and climate conditions than by provincial standards and guidelines. These results underscore the necessity of spatially resolved data collection and modelling to provide accurate estimates of the environmental impacts of crop production and to support more sustainable management of arable crop production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".