The BOLD Science Conference 2022: Abstract Book Featuring the Work of Undergraduate Science College Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The BOLD Science Conference is organized by the Science College and Science College Student Association at Concordia University and was held on May 6th and 7th. This year’s theme was wildfires. The conference promotes the multidisciplinary nature of science and science communication/literacy. It highlights the exceptional research performed by the undergraduate students at the Science College, which were presented as virtual poster presentations through the Gathertown online platform. The Minor in Multidisciplinary Studies in Science (Science College) at Concordia is a program for undergraduates interested in pursuing a career in scientific research. The students are required to complete a minimum of two research projects outside of their Major, in the spirit of promoting the multidisciplinary nature of research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.103 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.031 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".