Semisupervised Hyperspectral Image Classification Using a Probabilistic Pseudo-Label Generation Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) show impressive performance for hyperspectral image (HSI) classification when abundant labeled samples are available. The problem is that HSI sample annotation is extremely costly and the budget for this task is usually limited. To reduce the reliance on labeled samples, deep semi-supervised learning (SSL), which jointly learns from labeled and unlabeled samples, has been introduced in the literature. However, learning robust and discriminative features from unlabeled data is a challenging task due to various noise effects and ambiguity of unlabeled samples. As a result, recent advances are constrained, mainly in the pre-training or warm-up stage. In this paper, we propose a deep probabilistic framework to generate reliable pseudo labels to explicitly learn discriminative features from unlabeled samples. The generated pseudo labels of our proposed framework can be fed to various DNNs to improve their generalization capacity. Our proposed framework takes only 10 labeled samples per class to represent the label set as an uncertainty-aware distribution in the latent space. The pseudo labels are then generated for those unlabeled samples whose feature values match the distribution with high probability. By performing extensive experiments on four publicly available datasets, we show that our framework can generate reliable pseudo labels to significantly improve the generalization capacity of several state-of-the-art DNNs. In addition, we introduce a new DNN for HSI classification that demonstrates outstanding accuracy results in comparison with its rivals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".