<i>Puccinia pulverulenta</i> . [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A description is provided for Puccinia pulverulenta , which is parasitic on leaves of Epilobium hirsutum . Some information on its taxonomy, morphology, associated organisms, habitats, dispersal and transmission and conservation status are given, along with details of its geographical distribution (Morocco, Afghanistan, China (Xinjiang-Uighur Autonomous Region), Republic of Georgia, India (Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand), Iran, Israel, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Russia (Kamchatka Oblast, Magadan Oblast, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug), Turkey, Australia (New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria), New Zealand, American Virgin Islands, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Channel Islands, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Irish Republic, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia (Kursk Oblast, Leningrad Oblast, Republic of Dagestan, Stavropol Krai), Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, UK, Canada (Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, Saskatchewan), Mexico, USA (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming), Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil (Sao Paulo), Chile, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela) and hosts (members of the Onagraceae, primarily species of Epilobium ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".