Genetic-interaction screens uncover novel biological roles and regulators of transcription factors in fission yeast
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, systematic analyses of single transcription factor deletion or overexpression strains have made substantial advances in determining the biological roles and target genes of transcription factors, yet these characteristics are still relatively unknown for over a quarter of them. Moreover, the comprehensive list of proteins that regulate transcription factors remains incomplete. To further characterize Schizosaccharomyces pombe transcription factors, we performed synthetic sick/lethality and synthetic dosage lethality screens by synthetic genetic array. Examination of 2,672 transcription factor double deletion strains revealed a sick/lethality interaction frequency of 1.72%. Phenotypic analysis of these sick/lethality strains revealed potential cell cycle roles for several poorly characterized transcription factors, including SPBC56F2.05, SPCC320.03, and SPAC3C7.04. In addition, we examined synthetic dosage lethality interactions between 14 transcription factors and a miniarray of 279 deletion strains, observing a synthetic dosage lethality frequency of 4.99%, which consisted of known and novel transcription factor regulators. The miniarray contained deletions of genes that encode primarily posttranslational-modifying enzymes to identify putative upstream regulators of the transcription factor query strains. We discovered that ubiquitin ligase Ubr1 and its E2/E3-interacting protein, Mub1, degrade the glucose-responsive transcriptional repressor Scr1. Loss of ubr1+ or mub1+ increased Scr1 protein expression, which resulted in enhanced repression of flocculation through Scr1. The synthetic dosage lethality screen also captured interactions between Scr1 and 2 of its known repressors, Sds23 and Amk2, each affecting flocculation through Scr1 by influencing its nuclear localization. Our study demonstrates that sick/lethality and synthetic dosage lethality screens can be effective in uncovering novel functions and regulators of Schizosaccharomyces pombe transcription factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".