Dark Current Modeling for a Polyimide—Amorphous Lead Oxide-Based Direct Conversion X-ray Detector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reduction of the dark current (DC) to a tolerable level in amorphous selenium (a-Se) X-ray photoconductors was one of the key factors that led to the successful commercialization of a-Se-based direct conversion flat panel X-ray imagers (FPXIs) and their widespread clinical use. Here, we discuss the origin of DC in another X-ray photoconductive structure that utilizes amorphous lead oxide (a-PbO) as an X-ray-to-charge transducer and polyimide (PI) as a blocking layer. The transient DC in a PI/a-PbO detector is measured at different applied electric fields (5-20 V/μm). The experimental results are used to develop a theoretical model describing the electric field-dependent transient behavior of DC. The results of the DC kinetics modeling show that the DC, shortly after the bias application, is primarily controlled by the injection of holes from the positively biased electrode and gradually decays with time to a steady-state value. DC decays by the overarching mechanism of an electric field redistribution, caused by the accumulation of trapped holes in deep localized states within the bulk of PI. Thermal generation and subsequent multiple-trapping (MT) controlled transport of holes within the a-PbO layer governs the steady-state value at all the applied fields investigated here, except for the largest applied field of 20 V/μm. This suggests that a thicker layer of PI would be more optimal to suppress DC in the PI/a-PbO detector presented here. The model can be used to find an approximate optimal thickness of PI for future iterations of PI/a-PbO detectors without the need for time and labor-intensive experimental trial and error. In addition, we show that accounting for the field-induced charge carrier release from traps, enhanced by charge hopping transitions between the traps, yields an excellent fit between the experimental and simulated results, thus, clarifying the dynamic process of reaching a steady-state occupancy level of the deep localized states in the PI. Practically, the electric field redistribution causes the internal field to increase in magnitude in the a-PbO layer, thus improving charge collection efficiency and temporal performance over time, as confirmed by experimental results. The electric field redistribution can be implemented as a warm-up time for a-PbO-based detectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".