Out-of-Core Edge Partitioning at Linear Run-Time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph edge partitioning is an important prepro-cessing step to optimize distributed computing jobs on graph-structured data. The edge set of a given graph is split into$k$equally-sized partitions, such that the replication of vertices across partitions is minimized. Out-of-core edge partitioning algorithms are able to tackle the problem with low memory over-head. Existing out-of-core algorithms mainly work in a streaming manner and can be grouped into two types. While stateless streaming edge partitioning is fast and yields low partitioning quality, stateful streaming edge partitioning yields better quality, but is expensive, as it requires a scoring function to be evaluated for every edge on every partition, leading to a time complexity of O(|E| *k). In this paper, we propose 2PS-L, a novel out-of-core edge partitioning algorithm that builds upon the stateful streaming model, but achieves linear run-time i.e.,O(|E|)). 2PS-L consists of two phases. In the first phase, vertices are separated into clusters by a lightweight streaming clustering algorithm. In the second phase, the graph is re-streamed and vertex clustering from the first phase is exploited to reduce the search space of graph partitioning to only two target partitions for every edge. Our evaluations show that 2PS-L can achieve better partitioning quality than existing stateful streaming edge partitioners while having a much lower run-time. As a consequence, the total run-time of partitioning and subsequent distributed graph processing can be significantly reduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".