MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289884538 · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13952

<scp>AF‐vapeR</scp> : A multivariate genome scan for detecting parallel evolution using allele frequency change vectors

2022· article· en· W4289884538 on OpenAlexaff
James R. Whiting, Josephine R. Paris, Mijke J. van der Zee, Bonnie A. Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in Ecology and Evolution · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsAllele frequencyBiologyLocal adaptationEvolutionary biologyGeneticsAllelePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The repeatability of evolution at the genetic level has been demonstrated to vary along a continuum from complete parallelism to divergence. In order to better understand why this continuum exists within and among systems, hypotheses must be tested using high‐confidence candidate loci for repeatability. However, few methods have been developed to scan SNP data for signatures specifically associated with repeatability, as opposed to local adaptation. We present AF‐vapeR (Allele Frequency Vector Analysis of Parallel Evolutionary Responses), an approach designed to identify genomic regions exhibiting highly correlated allele frequency changes within haplotypes and among replicated allele frequency change vectors. The method divides the genome into windows of an equivalent number of SNPs, and within each window performs eigen decomposition over normalised allele frequency change vectors (AFVs), each derived from a replicated pair of populations/species. Properties of the resulting eigenvalue distribution can be used to compare regions of the genome for those exhibiting strong geometric parallelism, and can also be compared against a null distribution derived from randomly permuted AFVs. Furthermore, the shape of the eigenvalue distribution can reveal multiple axes of parallelism within datasets. We demonstrate the utility of this approach to detect different modes of parallel evolution using simulations, and a reduced type‐II error rate compared with intersecting F ST outliers. Lastly, we apply AF‐vapeR to four previously published datasets (stickleback, Drosophila , guppies and Galapagos finches) which comprise a range of sampling and sequencing strategies, and lineage ages. We detect known parallel regions while also identifying novel candidates. The main benefits of this approach include a reduced false‐negative rate under many conditions, an emphasis on signals associated specifically with repeatable evolution as opposed to local adaptation, and an opportunity to identify different modes of parallel evolution at the first instance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in Ecology and EvolutionSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207