MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289928099 · doi:10.1016/j.hrcr.2022.07.021

Coronary sinus spasm with catheter entrapment and adjacent coronary artery compression during an ablation procedure in a child

2022· article· en· W4289928099 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Vô, Anne Fournier, Joaquim Miró, Paul Khairy

Bibliographic record

VenueHeartRhythm Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronary sinusEntrapmentCatheterCardiologyArteryCatheter ablationSinus (botany)Internal medicineCoronary arteriesContractilitySurgeryAnesthesiaAblation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Teaching Points•Entrapment of catheters and guidewires is an uncommon but well-recognized complication of electrophysiology procedures.•The complex array of circular and longitudinal smooth muscles surrounding the coronary sinus enables proximal sphincter-like contractility to optimize blood flow, but may also predispose to catheter-induced spasm.•Spasm of the coronary sinus with catheter entrapment can be associated with mechanical compression of the adjacent coronary artery.•A strategy of cutting the handle off the entrapped catheter, advancing a long sheath over the catheter, and delivering nitroglycerin inside the coronary sinus while applying gentle traction and countertraction could be effective in relieving the spasm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeartRhythm Case ReportsSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207