Déconstruire le piédestal catholique, se réapproprier le corps et s’affirmer comme sujet : une analyse de la notion de maternité dans <i>L’autre Parole</i> (1976–2021)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article analyses how the Quebec Christian feminist collective, L’autre Parole, has treated maternity in its eponymous journal since 1976. It shows how Mary and the idea of a feminine vocation, both framed by the Catholic Magisterium as maternal by essence, are contested and deconstructed by L’autre Parole. This collective has developed an alternative discourse to Catholic teachings on the woman, in which motherhood (biological or spiritual) is elevated as the exclusive and ultimate horizon and vocation of a woman. An analysis of the collective’s discourse and symbolic practices related to issues surrounding maternity (abortion, new reproductive technologies, and activists’ mothers-daughters relationships) illustrates the evolution of the radical and materialist feminist stance. Without losing sight of conceptual tools like gender relations and collective ownership of women, it integrates eco-feminist thought and adopts a non-hierarchical perspective with respect to life and the defence of women’s rights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".