MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290004660 · doi:10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13

A Dynamical Systems Model for Face Perception

2021· article· en· W4290004660 on OpenAlexaff
Abraham Boyarsky, Paweł Góra

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusiform face areaStimulus (psychology)Fusiform gyrusComputer scienceFace perceptionPerceptionMathematicsArtificial intelligencePsychologyNeuroscienceCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fusiform face area, or FFA, is a small region found on the inferior (bottom) surface of the temporal lobe. It is located in a gyrus called the fusiform gyrus.Studies in humans have shown that the FFA is sensitive to both face parts and face configurations. Recoding activity in the FFA showed that most of the neurons in the FFA are active in response to facial imagery, but not in response to images of other body parts or objects. Visual sensory neurons sensitive to a face feature and possessing a related firing rate activate an associated cluster of neurons in the FFA. This results in a partition of the FFA into clusters that respond to the various facial features. Once an entire face stimulus activates the FFA, interneurons redistribute the initial activation via the neural network. In this article a novel approach to modelling the function of the network is presented. We define by a transition matrix that describes probabilistically how one cluster, firing at a synchronous rate, affects the others in the FFA. The initial face stimulation in the FFA together with the transition matrix defines a dynamical system which possesses a stationary probability function. We claim that a stationary probability function uniquely represents a face. Among the properties of this probability function are: 1) response magnitude invariance, 2) repurposing of clusters to define new stationary probability function on the FFA partition; 3) stability of stationary probabilities under perturbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Mathematical and Computer ModellingSame topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207