Two‐dimensional synthetic aperture imaging of targets behind reinforced concrete walls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Synthetic aperture imaging of targets closely behind a reinforced concrete wall, modelled by a periodic structure by using the proper Green's function (GF) of the structure, is studied. To compute the GF accurately, using the rigorous coupled‐wave analysis (RCWA) is proposed. The radiation of a line source in the spectral domain as a summation of plane waves is represented. Illuminating the periodic structure by each plane wave, Bragg modes by RCWA are computed. Then, the GF is estimated as the superposition of all the Bragg modes' contributions. The numerical Finite Element Method results of COMSOL validate the results of our semi‐analytical approach. Having COMSOL numerically calculated backscattered fields of a target behind the wall and the simple free‐space GF, the synthetic aperture image of a target is not focussed. Employing the phase of the proper GF instead of the simple free‐space GF, the target image is successfully refocussed. The effect of the number of Bragg modes on the estimation of the GF and also uncertainties in the distances between reinforced metallic bars on the target image is investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".