Adapting InSAR Phase Linking for Seasonally Snow-Covered Terrain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) time series analysis of natural terrain allows for characterization of long-term geophysical trends over extended areas and, in the case of distributed scatterers (DSs), is significantly enhanced by methods that exploit the full complex-valued scattering statistics. Phase-linking (PL) estimators impose a phase-closure constraint in order to estimate the temporal wrapped-phase history of a DS directly from its complex backscatter sample coherence matrix. Some PL methods, such as the SqueeSAR and maximum-likelihood-estimator of Interferometric phase (EMI) estimators, rely on knowledge of the coherence magnitude matrix. The true coherence magnitude isa prioriunknown and must therefore be estimated from the data. Bias in these estimated coherence magnitudes reduces PL performance when the true coherence magnitude is low. Many areas of the Earth are seasonally snow-covered and, for natural terrain, this leads to severe cross-season decorrelation. This poses a significant challenge for PL estimators due to bias of the near-zero cross-season coherence magnitude estimates. We introduce a clustering approach to mitigate the PL estimator bias problem that exploits the fact that in natural terrain, many DSs decorrelate similarly. This allows for averaging over large numbers of same-behaving DS, which provides robust debiasing of the coherence magnitudes used during PL. We apply our method to a RADARSAT-2 spotlight-mode InSAR dataset over a site in the western Canadian Arctic and demonstrate significant reductions ina posterioriphase variance when compared to existing PL methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".