MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290188500 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1404.3328

Myopic Bounds for Optimal Policy of POMDPs: An extension of Lovejoy's\n structural results

2014· preprint· W4290188500 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2014
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtension (predicate logic)Bounded functionMarkov decision processMathematical optimizationRelaxation (psychology)Mathematical economicsUpper and lower boundsComputer scienceMathematicsMarkov processEconomicsApplied mathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a relaxation of the sufficient conditions, and also an\nextension of the structural results for Partially Observed Markov Decision\nProcesses (POMDPs) given in Lovejoy (1987). Sufficient conditions are provided\nso that the optimal policy can be upper and lower bounded by judiciously chosen\nmyopic policies. These myopic policy bounds are constructed to maximize the\nvolume of belief states where they coincide with the optimal policy. Numerical\nexamples illustrate these myopic bounds for both continuous and discrete\nobservation sets.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it