MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290391039 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.06111

An efficient implementation of graph-based invariant set algorithm for constrained nonlinear dynamical systems

2022· preprint· en· W4290391039 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Decardi-Nelsona, Jinfeng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmSubdivisionComputer scienceInvariant (physics)Nonlinear systemGraphSet (abstract data type)Mathematical optimizationTheoretical computer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The graph-based invariant set (GIS) algorithm is a promising set-based technique for computing the largest (with respect to inclusion) control invariant set of general discrete-time nonlinear dynamical systems. However, like other invariant set algorithms for nonlinear systems, the GIS algorithm may require a lot of resources when computing the control invariant set. This limits its applicability to higher dimensional systems. In this work, we present an improved and efficient implementation of the GIS algorithm for general discrete-time controlled nonlinear systems. We first identify the bottlenecks through extensive analysis, and then provide remedial procedures to improve the implementation of the GIS algorithm. Specifically, we developed an adaptive subdivision scheme using a supervised machine learning-based algorithm to reduce the cell growth rate and parallelize the graph construction step. We extensively demonstrate the performance of the improved GIS algorithm using a numerical example and compare the result to that of the standard GIS algorithm. The results show that the adaptive subdivision and the parallelization improved the speed of the algorithm by about 8x and 3x respectively, that of the standard GIS algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207