MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290471690 · doi:10.1002/aocs.12630

Cocoa butter equivalent from <scp>Kpangnan</scp> butter and <scp>Pequi</scp> oil

2022· article· en· W4290471690 on OpenAlexafffund
Saeed M. Ghazani, Andréa Madalena Maciel Guedes, Rosemar Antoniassi, Ming‐Chih Chiu, Alejandro G. Marangoni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTriclinic crystal systemCrystallizationMelting pointChemistryFood scienceFreezing pointCrystallographyCrystal structureOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Novel cocoa butter equivalents were designed using dry fractionated Pequi oil and solvent fractionated Kpangnan butter. Static crystallization of binary mixtures into the triclinic form ( β 2 ) was achieved after 12 days of static crystallization at room temperature for all mixtures and after 4 days only for the 80:20 w/w and 90:10 w/w fractionated Kpangnan: Pequi oil mixtures. However, after 60 days of storage at 22°C, all binary blends (except 100% fractionated pequi oil and 100% fractionated Kpangnan butter) were crystallized in the most stable triclinic crystal form ( β 1 ). Here we also reported a higher melting behavior for the fractionated Pequi oil: fractionated Kpangnan (80:20 w/w and 90:10 w/w), after 4 days of static crystallization at room 22°C, which, based on the x‐ray results, could be addressed to completion of crystal polymorphic transition to the triclinic β 2 form during 4 days of storage. Our results suggest that the 70:30 w/w fractionated Pequi oil: Kpangnan mixture after 60 days of storage at 22°C showed a melting point of 34°C, a stable triclinic β 2 form, and a triglyceride composition of 28% POP, 4.6% POS, and 33% SOS displayed solid‐state characteristics, melting point, and crystal structure, of a novel cocoa butter equivalent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFrench-language works237,207