MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290643772 · doi:10.1364/optica.464445

Controlling the polarization and phase of high-order harmonics with aplasmonic metasurface

2022· article· en· W4290643772 on OpenAlex
Sohail A. Jalil, Kashif M. Awan, Idriss A. Ali, Sabaa Rashid, Joshua Baxter, Aleksey Korobenko, Guilmot Ernotte, A. Naumov, D. M. Villeneuve, A. Staudte, Pierre Berini, Lora Ramunno, Giulio Vampa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptica · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmonHarmonicsPolarization (electrochemistry)OpticsPhysicsPhase (matter)OptoelectronicsMaterials scienceChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanostructured surfaces, or metasurfaces, allow exquisite control of linear and nonlinear optical processes by reshaping the amplitude, phase, and polarization of electric and magnetic fields near wavelength-scale heterogeneities. Recently, metasurfaces have broken new ground in high-field attosecond science where they have been utilized to amplify the emission of high-order harmonics of femtosecond infrared laser pulses, a notoriously inefficient process, by enhancing the incident field, and to shape the emitted high harmonics in space. Here we show control of the polarization and phase of high harmonics with a plasmonic metasurface. We design and fabricate perpendicularly aligned rectangular gold antennas on a silicon crystal that generate circularly polarized deep-ultraviolet high harmonics, from a circularly polarized infrared driver, providing a simple path for achieving circular emission from patterned crystals. Our metasurface enhances the circularly polarized harmonics up to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mn>43</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> times when compared to the unpatterned surface, where harmonics are quenched. Looking forward, circularly polarized high harmonics will be useful tools for sensing chiral laser–matter interactions and magnetic materials. Our approach paves the way for polarization control at even shorter, extreme ultraviolet, wavelengths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it