MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290695246 · doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00204

Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned

2022· review· en· W4290695246 on OpenAlexafffund
Severino Jefferson Ribeiro da Silva, Jéssica Catarine Frutuoso do Nascimento, Renata Pessôa Germano Mendes, Klarissa Miranda Guarines, Caroline Targino Alves da Silva, Poliana Gomes da Silva, Jurandy Júnior Ferraz de Magalhães, Justin R. J. Vigar, Abelardo Silva‐Júnior, Alain Kohl, Keith Pardee, Lindomar Pena

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversidade Federal de AlagoasFundação Oswaldo CruzUniversity of TorontoFundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de PernambucoUniversity of GlasgowUniversidade de PernambucoInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsPandemicPublic healthCoronavirusDiseaseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Transmission (telecommunications)EpidemiologySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VirologyMedicineIntensive care medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Pathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a highly transmissible and virulent human-infecting coronavirus that emerged in late December 2019 in Wuhan, China, causing a respiratory disease called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has massively impacted global public health and caused widespread disruption to daily life. The crisis caused by COVID-19 has mobilized scientists and public health authorities across the world to rapidly improve our knowledge about this devastating disease, shedding light on its management and control, and spawned the development of new countermeasures. Here we provide an overview of the state of the art of knowledge gained in the last 2 years about the virus and COVID-19, including its origin and natural reservoir hosts, viral etiology, epidemiology, modes of transmission, clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, emerging variants, and vaccines, highlighting important differences from previously known highly pathogenic coronaviruses. We also discuss selected key discoveries from each topic and underline the gaps of knowledge for future investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations136
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Infectious DiseasesSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207