MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290786019 · doi:10.1016/j.idm.2022.07.009

A Naive Bayes model on lung adenocarcinoma projection based on tumor microenvironment and weighted gene co-expression network analysis

2022· article· en· W4290786019 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInfectious Disease Modelling · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Research ChairsChongqing Normal University
KeywordsKEGGGeneStromal cellAdenocarcinomaBiologyTumor microenvironmentImmune systemBayes' theoremLung cancerSurvival analysisProportional hazards modelComputational biologyNaive Bayes classifierReceiver operating characteristicGene expressionOncologyCancer researchCancerTranscriptomeGeneticsMedicineInternal medicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceBayesian probabilitySupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) gene expression data from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database, the Stromal score, Immune score and Estimate score in tumor microenvironment (TME) were computed by the Estimation of Stromal and Immune cells in Malignant Tumor tissues using Expression data (ESTIMATE) algorithm. And gene modules significantly related to the three scores were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Based on the correlation coefficients and P values, 899 key genes affecting tumor microenvironment were obtained by selecting the two most correlated modules. It was suggested through Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis that these key genes were significantly involved in immune-related or cancer-related terms. Through univariate cox regression and elastic network analysis, genes associated with prognosis of the LUAD patients were screened out and their prognostic values were further verified by the survival analysis and the University of ALabama at Birmingham CANcer (UALCAN) database. The results indicated that eight genes were significantly related to the overall survival of LUAD. Among them, six genes were found differentially expressed between tumor and control samples. And immune infiltration analysis further verified that all the six genes were significantly related to tumor purity and immune cells. Therefore, these genes were used eventually for constructing a Naive Bayes projection model of LUAD. The model was verified by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve where the area under curve (AUC) reached 92.03%, which suggested that the model could discriminate the tumor samples from the normal accurately. Our study provided an effective model for LUAD projection which improved the clinical diagnosis and cure of LUAD. The result also confirmed that the six genes in the model construction could be the potential prognostic biomarkers of LUAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it