MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290928423 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.013

Cocoa Companion: Deep Learning-Based Smartphone Application for Cocoa Disease Detection

2022· article· en· W4290928423 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersUniversity of SaskatchewanPennsylvania State University
KeywordsComputer scienceUploadConvolutional neural networkDeep learningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningCloud computingPattern recognition (psychology)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of machine learning (ML) in crop disease detection has gain significant attention from both academia and industry lately. This paper posits that ML techniques can be employed for early detection and diagnosis of the two (2) major diseases that affect cocoa production namely – Swollen Shoot and Black Pod. In this regard, a mobile application is designed with ML techniques integrated to enable cocoa farmers take a picture of the cocoa pod and upload for the diagnosis, which takes place on a backend cloud service. The automatic detection and diagnosis of diseases is based on the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for image analysis and classification. In the paper, four (4) CNN models are built and trained. The best performing model is SSD MobileNet V2 with over 80% confidence detection score.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it