Deep learning and high harmonic generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using machine learning, we explore the utility of various deep neural networks when applied to high harmonic generation scenarios. First, we train the neural networks to predict the time-dependent dipoles and spectra of high harmonic emission from reduced-dimensionality models of di- and triatomic systems based on sets of randomly generated parameters (laser pulse intensity, internuclear distance, and molecular orientation). These networks, once trained, are useful tools to rapidly simulate the high harmonic spectra of our systems. Similarly, we have trained the neural networks to solve the inverse problem—to determine the molecular parameters based on high harmonic spectra or dipole acceleration data. The latter types of networks could then be used as spectroscopic tools to invert high harmonic spectra in order to recover the underlying physical parameters of a system. Next, we demonstrate that transfer learning can be applied to our networks to expand the range of applicability of the networks with only a small number of new test cases added to our training sets. Finally, we demonstrate neural networks that can be used to classify molecules by type: di- or triatomic, symmetric or asymmetric. With outlooks toward training with experimental data, these neural network topologies offer a novel set of spectroscopic tools that could be incorporated into high harmonic generation experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".