MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290988545 · doi:10.1016/j.shj.2022.100064

Successful Fenestration of an Extracardiac Conduit in a Fontan Patient With the Baylis NRG RF Transeptal Needle and Creation of Fontan Fenestration with a 20-mm 535 Formula Stent

2022· article· en· W4290988545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wan Kim, Francisco Gonzalez-Barlatay, Demetris Michalaki Taliotis

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Heart · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFenestrationMedicineFontan procedureCardiologyInternal medicineSurgeryVentricle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 16-year-old male had a history of hypoplastic left-heart syndrome and previous Fontan completion with a lateral tunnel at the age of 4 years. He developed a recurrent plastic bronchitis on optimal medical therapy. He was treated with oral prednisolone, nebulized DNase, and beclomethasone with regular bronchoscopic washes on top of lisinopril, sildenafil, and aspirin. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 1a and b) showed no evidence of obstruction in the pulmonary arteries, absence of Fontan thrombus, mild right atrioventricular valve regurgitation, mild neo-aortic valve regurgitation, mild single ventricular dysfunction, and no outflow obstructions. This ruled out etiologies that could be optimized with interventional treatment, and he was on full possible medical therapy. Patient’s Fontan pressure was elevated from a diagnostic catheterization at 16 mmHg. After interdisciplinary team discussions with congenital surgeons and cardiologists, it was decided to attempt creation of a fenestration, to optimize systemic output and reduce venous congestion.1Chaudhari M. Stumper O. Plastic bronchitis after Fontan operation: treatment with stent fenestration of the Fontan circuit.Heart. 2004; 90: 801Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar,2Wilson J. Russell J. Williams W. Benson L. Fenestration of the Fontan circuit as treatment for plastic bronchitis.Pediatr Cardiol. 2005; 26: 717-719Crossref PubMed Scopus (51) Google ScholarIn this patient with a prosthetic Fontan tunnel, puncturing would involve using one of the conventional transeptal needles made of stainless steel. With the rigid nature of the prosthetic material comprising the Fontan tunnel, puncturing would require more aggressive force than when performing a transeptal puncture. This requirement for additional force leads to higher risk of perforation of atria or pulmonary veins. By using radiofrequency (RF) needles, we can perforate the prosthesis with less force and enhanced control. Hence, we describe a case of creating a fenestration in the Fontan conduit using an NRG RF transeptal needle (NRG-E-HF-71-C0; Baylis Medical Inc, Quebec, Canada) followed by implantation of a 20-mm 535 Formula stent premounted on a 10-mm balloon (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana).Under general anesthetic, a 5F sheath was introduced in the right femoral vein. Using a 5F pigtail catheter, pressure in the inferior vena cava was measured at 16 mmHg. Angiogram showed a patent conduit with confluent branch pulmonary arteries. The conduit curved around the right atrium before inserting into the right pulmonary artery (Figure 1c and d). The femoral vein sheath was upsized to an 8.5F 63-cm FastCath (St. Jude Medical, Saint Paul, Minnesota) and advanced into the conduit. An NRG RF transeptal needle with a C-0 curve (Figure 1) was inserted through the dilator and sheath to the tip. Under transesophageal echo guidance, 3 1-second currents were applied while pushing forward gently. The needle advanced with minimum pressure to the right atrium. This was confirmed with a contrast injection through the radiofrequency needle sheath (Figure 1e and f). A 5F multipurpose A1 catheter was introduced through the sheath into the left upper pulmonary vein. Next, a 1-cm-tip 0.035-inch Amplatz Super Stiff Wire (Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois) was introduced into the left upper pulmonary vein. Next, a 10 × 20-mm 535 Formula stent was introduced through the sheath with the first 2 strands exposed. Balloon was inflated to create a distal cone, and then the stent was pulled back to the fenestration. Stent was then uncovered, and hand injection through the sheath showed it to be across the fenestration to the lumen of the conduit. Inflation of the stent was done until the central portion reached around 4 mm (Figure 1g). A 2.5 × 3-cm PTS-X Balloon (NuMed, Boca Raton, Florida) was then introduced and inflated to flare the distal and proximal ends. Thereafter, a 6 mm × 2-cm POWERFLEX Balloon (Cardinal Health, Dublin, Ohio) was used, inflated to 14 atm (Figure 1h). The final angiogram showed a well-seated stent with flaring of both ends and a fenestration lumen measuring around 5.5 mm with transesophageal echo and fluoroscopy (Figure 1i).At 18-month follow-up, there was no further recurrence of the plastic bronchitis. The patient was successfully weaned off his oral and inhaled steroids over time.For a prosthetic Fontan conduit, creating a fenestration and stenting can be facilitated by a combination of RF needle puncture followed by placement of a balloon expandable stent.Consent statementConsent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.FundingThe authors have no funding to report. A 16-year-old male had a history of hypoplastic left-heart syndrome and previous Fontan completion with a lateral tunnel at the age of 4 years. He developed a recurrent plastic bronchitis on optimal medical therapy. He was treated with oral prednisolone, nebulized DNase, and beclomethasone with regular bronchoscopic washes on top of lisinopril, sildenafil, and aspirin. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 1a and b) showed no evidence of obstruction in the pulmonary arteries, absence of Fontan thrombus, mild right atrioventricular valve regurgitation, mild neo-aortic valve regurgitation, mild single ventricular dysfunction, and no outflow obstructions. This ruled out etiologies that could be optimized with interventional treatment, and he was on full possible medical therapy. Patient’s Fontan pressure was elevated from a diagnostic catheterization at 16 mmHg. After interdisciplinary team discussions with congenital surgeons and cardiologists, it was decided to attempt creation of a fenestration, to optimize systemic output and reduce venous congestion.1Chaudhari M. Stumper O. Plastic bronchitis after Fontan operation: treatment with stent fenestration of the Fontan circuit.Heart. 2004; 90: 801Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar,2Wilson J. Russell J. Williams W. Benson L. Fenestration of the Fontan circuit as treatment for plastic bronchitis.Pediatr Cardiol. 2005; 26: 717-719Crossref PubMed Scopus (51) Google Scholar In this patient with a prosthetic Fontan tunnel, puncturing would involve using one of the conventional transeptal needles made of stainless steel. With the rigid nature of the prosthetic material comprising the Fontan tunnel, puncturing would require more aggressive force than when performing a transeptal puncture. This requirement for additional force leads to higher risk of perforation of atria or pulmonary veins. By using radiofrequency (RF) needles, we can perforate the prosthesis with less force and enhanced control. Hence, we describe a case of creating a fenestration in the Fontan conduit using an NRG RF transeptal needle (NRG-E-HF-71-C0; Baylis Medical Inc, Quebec, Canada) followed by implantation of a 20-mm 535 Formula stent premounted on a 10-mm balloon (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana). Under general anesthetic, a 5F sheath was introduced in the right femoral vein. Using a 5F pigtail catheter, pressure in the inferior vena cava was measured at 16 mmHg. Angiogram showed a patent conduit with confluent branch pulmonary arteries. The conduit curved around the right atrium before inserting into the right pulmonary artery (Figure 1c and d). The femoral vein sheath was upsized to an 8.5F 63-cm FastCath (St. Jude Medical, Saint Paul, Minnesota) and advanced into the conduit. An NRG RF transeptal needle with a C-0 curve (Figure 1) was inserted through the dilator and sheath to the tip. Under transesophageal echo guidance, 3 1-second currents were applied while pushing forward gently. The needle advanced with minimum pressure to the right atrium. This was confirmed with a contrast injection through the radiofrequency needle sheath (Figure 1e and f). A 5F multipurpose A1 catheter was introduced through the sheath into the left upper pulmonary vein. Next, a 1-cm-tip 0.035-inch Amplatz Super Stiff Wire (Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois) was introduced into the left upper pulmonary vein. Next, a 10 × 20-mm 535 Formula stent was introduced through the sheath with the first 2 strands exposed. Balloon was inflated to create a distal cone, and then the stent was pulled back to the fenestration. Stent was then uncovered, and hand injection through the sheath showed it to be across the fenestration to the lumen of the conduit. Inflation of the stent was done until the central portion reached around 4 mm (Figure 1g). A 2.5 × 3-cm PTS-X Balloon (NuMed, Boca Raton, Florida) was then introduced and inflated to flare the distal and proximal ends. Thereafter, a 6 mm × 2-cm POWERFLEX Balloon (Cardinal Health, Dublin, Ohio) was used, inflated to 14 atm (Figure 1h). The final angiogram showed a well-seated stent with flaring of both ends and a fenestration lumen measuring around 5.5 mm with transesophageal echo and fluoroscopy (Figure 1i). At 18-month follow-up, there was no further recurrence of the plastic bronchitis. The patient was successfully weaned off his oral and inhaled steroids over time. For a prosthetic Fontan conduit, creating a fenestration and stenting can be facilitated by a combination of RF needle puncture followed by placement of a balloon expandable stent. Consent statementConsent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images. Consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images. FundingThe authors have no funding to report. The authors have no funding to report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructural HeartSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207