MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290988567 · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.981972

Myocardial disturbances of intermediary metabolism in Barth syndrome

2022· review· en· W4290988567 on OpenAlexafffund
Amanda A. Greenwell, Seyed Amirhossein Tabatabaei Dakhili, John R. Ussher

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCardiolipinCardiomyopathyMitochondrionEnergy metabolismMetabolismChemistryInternal medicineHeart failureBiochemistryBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

, which leads to immature cardiolipin (CL) remodeling and is characterized by the development of cardiomyopathy. The immature CL remodeling in BTHS results in electron transport chain respiratory defects and destabilization of supercomplexes, thereby impairing ATP production. Thus, BTHS-related cardiomyopathy appears to share metabolic characteristics of the failing heart being an "engine out of fuel." As CL associates with numerous mitochondrial enzymes involved in ATP production, BTHS is also characterized by several defects in intermediary energy metabolism. Herein we will describe the primary disturbances in intermediary energy metabolism relating to the heart's major fuel sources, fatty acids, carbohydrates, ketones, and amino acids. In addition, we will interrogate whether these disturbances represent potential metabolic targets for alleviating BTHS-related cardiomyopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207