Les relations entre ville et agriculture au prisme de l'innovation territoriale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le concept d’innovation territoriale est mobilisé dans la littérature pour analyser les rapports entre centre et périphérie, la qualité des milieux et la gouvernance territoriale. Nos recherches reprennent ce concept pour saisir les multiples dimensions des relations entre ville et agriculture et pour comprendre ainsi les transformations de l’agriculture dans le contexte de la société urbaine. Nous analysons pour cela les agencements sociaux, spatiaux et organisationnels qui s’opèrent dans les initiatives agri-urbaines locales. À partir d’une chronique de la place prise par l’agriculture dans l’aménagement urbain et dans les politiques locales, l’exemple de Montpellier permet d’illustrer comment ces agencements agri-urbains sont sources d’innovation territoriale. En effet, l’innovation devient territoriale par accumulation de micro-changements, qui finissent par infléchir des fonctionnements établis dans les usages et les normes qui régulent les relations entre ville et agriculture. Ce processus de passage à une plus grande échelle (scaling up) ouvre un champ de recherche sur les relations entre innovations territoriales et transitions globales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".