MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290993997 · doi:10.1109/icc45855.2022.9839180

Heterogeneous Coded Distributed Computing with Nonuniform Input File Popularity

2022· article· en· W4290993997 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShufflingComputer scienceComputational complexity theoryInteger programmingLinear programmingSimple (philosophy)Distributed File SystemInteger (computer science)File transferParallel computingDistributed computingMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsOperating systemTransfer (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the heterogeneous coded distributed computing (CDC) where input files required for job access have nonuniform popularity. We propose a file placement strategy that can handle an arbitrary number of input files and a nested coded shuffling strategy to effectively explore coded multicasting opportunities. We then formulate the joint optimization of the proposed file placement strategy and shuffling design variables into a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem. To reduce the computational complexity, we propose a simple two-file-group-based approach to obtain an approximate solution. Numerical results show that the proposed two-file-group-based approach achieves nearly the same performance as solving the MILP problem using the conventional branch-and-cut method but with substantially lower computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it