UAV-assisted Wireless Power Charging for Efficient Hybrid Coded Edge Computing Network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the ubiquitous sensing enabled by the Internet-of-Things (IoT), massive amount of data is generated every second, transforming the way we interact with the world. To manage big data and enable analytics at the edge of the network, large amount of computation power is required to perform the computation intensive tasks. However, the energy-constrained IoT devices are not able to perform the computation tasks without compromising the quality-of-service of the applications. In this paper, we propose a hybrid network in which users can offload their computation tasks to edge servers through coded edge offloading or perform local computation with the wireless power transfer derived from coalitions of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) serving as mobile charging stations. We consider a two-level optimization approach where an optimal UAV coalitional structure that minimizes the network cost is formed. In the performance evaluation, we provide extensive sensitivity analyses to study the performance of the cost minimization approach amid varying network parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it