Federated Multi-Task Learning with Non-Stationary Heterogeneous Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated multi-task learning (FMTL) is a promising edge learning framework to fit the data with non-independent and non-identical distribution (non-i.i.d.) by exploiting the correlations of personalized models. In many practical systems, the sensory data distribution in wireless systems is not only heterogeneous but also non-stationary due to the mobility of terminals and the randomness of link connections. The non-stationary heterogeneous data may lead to model divergence and staleness in the training stage and poor accuracy in the inference stage. In this paper, we design an adaptive FMTL framework, which can work in a non-stationary environment. We propose to optimize the model update scheme and cluster splitting scheme in the training stage to accelerate model convergencse when the training data are non-stationary. We further design a low-complexity model selection scheme in both the training and the inference stages to choose the best model for fitting the current data. The proposed framework is validated in two scenarios, linear regression and graph neural network (GNN)-based power control in wireless device-to-device (D2D) networks. Both sets of numerical results demonstrate that the proposed framework can accelerate the model training convergence and reduce the computation complexity while ensuring model accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.064 | 0.094 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".