Motor cortex outputs evoked by long-duration microstimulation encode synergistic muscle activation patterns not controlled movement trajectories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) parameters on the evoked electromyographic (EMG) responses and resulting limb movement were investigated. In ketamine-anesthetized cats, paw movement kinematics in 3D and EMG activity from 8 to 12 forelimb muscles evoked by ICMS applied to the forelimb area of the cat motor cortex (MCx) were recorded. The EMG responses evoked by ICMS were also compared to those evoked by focal ictal bursts induced by the iontophoretic ejection of the GABA A receptor antagonist bicuculline methochloride (BIC) at the same cortical point. The effects of different initial limb starting positions on movement trajectories resulting from long-duration ICMS were also studied. The ICMS duration did not affect the evoked muscle activation pattern (MAP). Short (50 ms) and long (500 ms) stimulus trains activated the same muscles in the same proportions. MAPs could, however, be modified by gradually increasing the stimulus intensity. MAPs evoked by focal ictal bursts were also highly correlated with those obtained by ICMS at the same cortical point. Varying the initial position of the forelimb did not change the MAPs evoked from a cortical point. Consequently, the evoked movements reached nearly the same final end point and posture, with variability. However, the movement trajectories were quite different depending on the initial limb configuration and starting position of the paw. The evoked movement trajectory was most natural when the forelimb lay pendant ~ perpendicular to the ground (i.e., in equilibrium with the gravitational force). From other starting positions, the movements did not appear natural. These observations demonstrate that while the output of the cortical point evokes a seemingly coordinated limb movement from a rest position, it does not specify a particular movement direction or a controlled trajectory from other initial positions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".