Ordination analysis of facade compositions of the complex of historical buildings of the Hospital of the Verkh-Isetsky plant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье на примере реализованного проекта приспособления памятника архитектуры первой четверти XIX века Госпиталя Верх-Исетского завода в г. Екатеринбурге рассматривается новый подход к разработке допустимых реконструктивных дополнений на основе изучения и использования при проектировании пропорционального строя объекта культурного наследия. Автор раскрывает способы нахождения доминирующего пропорционального строя и определяет его количественно через коэффициент ординации, показывая, как полученная таким образом информация может быть использована для получения соразмерных объемов, пространств, их элементов и членений для достижения большей слаженности сочетания старого и нового, избегая контрастных противопоставлений форм. Результат теоретического осмысления, авторский метод ординационного анализа, а также его применение для решения практических задач могут быть интересны как исследователям исторического наследия, так и практикующим архитекторам-реставраторам. The article considers a new approach to the development of permissible reconstructive additions based on the study and use in the design of the proportional structure of the cultural heritage object on the example of the implemented project of adaptation of the architectural monument of the first quarter of the XIX century of the Hospital of the Upper Iset Plant in Yekaterinburg. The author reveals the ways of finding the dominant proportional system and quantifies it through the ordination coefficient, showing how the information obtained in this way can be used to obtain commensurate volumes, spaces, their elements and divisions to achieve greater coherence of the combination of old and new, avoiding contrasting oppositions of forms. The result of theoretical understanding, the author‘s method of ordination analysis, as well as its application for solving practical problems may be of interest to both researchers of historical heritage and practicing architects-restorers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".