MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291009299 · doi:10.1093/brain/awac224

Interpretable surface-based detection of focal cortical dysplasias: a Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection study

2022· article· en· W4291009299 on OpenAlexaff
Hannah Spitzer, Mathilde Ripart, Kirstie Whitaker, Felice D’Arco, Kshitij Mankad, Andrew A. Chen, Antonio Napolitano, Luca De Palma, Alessandro De Benedictis, Stephen T. Foldes, Zachary Humphreys, Kai Zhang, Wenhan Hu, Jiajie Mo, Marcus Likeman, Shirin Davies, Christopher Güttler, Matteo Lenge, Nathan T. Cohen, Yingying Tang, Shan Wang, Ajai Chari, Martin Tisdall, Núria Bargalló, Estefanía Conde‐Blanco, José C. Pariente, Saül Pascual‐Diaz, Ignacio Delgado, Carmen Pérez‐Enríquez, Ilaria Lagorio, Eugenio Abela, Nandini Mullatti, Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh, Katy Vecchiato, Yawu Liu, Maria Eugenia Caligiuri, Ben Sinclair, Lucy Vivash, Anna Willard, Jothy Kandasamy, Ailsa McLellan, Drahoslav Sokol, Mira Semmelroch, Ane Kloster, Giske Opheim, Letícia Ribeiro, Clarissa Lin Yasuda, Maria Camilla Rossi‐Espagnet, Khalid Hamandi, Anna Tietze, Carmen Barba, Renzo Guerrini, William D. Gaillard, Xiaozhen You, Irène Wang, Sofía González‐Ortiz, Mariasavina Severino, Pasquale Striano, Domenico Tortora, Reetta Kälviäinen, Antonio Gambardella, Angelo Labate, Patricia Desmond, Elaine Lui, Terence J. O’Brien, Jay Shetty, Graeme D. Jackson, John S. Duncan, Gavin P. Winston, Lars H. Pinborg, Fernando Cendes, Fabian J. Theis, Russell T. Shinohara, J. Helen Cross, Torsten Baldeweg, Sophie Adler, Konrad Wagstyl

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthRegione ToscanaMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research CentreMedical Research Council Centre for Neurodevelopmental DisordersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSaastamoisen säätiöFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchRosetrees TrustAlan Turing InstituteChildren's National HospitalIntellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterLlywodraeth CymruKing's College LondonLundbeckfondenHealth and Care Research WalesWellcome TrustNational Health and Medical Research CouncilKing’s College London
KeywordsEpilepsyLesionCortical dysplasiaNeuroscienceMedicinePathologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One outstanding challenge for machine learning in diagnostic biomedical imaging is algorithm interpretability. A key application is the identification of subtle epileptogenic focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) from structural MRI. FCDs are difficult to visualize on structural MRI but are often amenable to surgical resection. We aimed to develop an open-source, interpretable, surface-based machine-learning algorithm to automatically identify FCDs on heterogeneous structural MRI data from epilepsy surgery centres worldwide. The Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) Project collated and harmonized a retrospective MRI cohort of 1015 participants, 618 patients with focal FCD-related epilepsy and 397 controls, from 22 epilepsy centres worldwide. We created a neural network for FCD detection based on 33 surface-based features. The network was trained and cross-validated on 50% of the total cohort and tested on the remaining 50% as well as on 2 independent test sites. Multidimensional feature analysis and integrated gradient saliencies were used to interrogate network performance. Our pipeline outputs individual patient reports, which identify the location of predicted lesions, alongside their imaging features and relative saliency to the classifier. On a restricted 'gold-standard' subcohort of seizure-free patients with FCD type IIB who had T1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI data, the MELD FCD surface-based algorithm had a sensitivity of 85%. Across the entire withheld test cohort the sensitivity was 59% and specificity was 54%. After including a border zone around lesions, to account for uncertainty around the borders of manually delineated lesion masks, the sensitivity was 67%. This multicentre, multinational study with open access protocols and code has developed a robust and interpretable machine-learning algorithm for automated detection of focal cortical dysplasias, giving physicians greater confidence in the identification of subtle MRI lesions in individuals with epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations132
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207