SHARP: An Adaptable, Energy-Efficient Accelerator for Recurrent Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effectiveness of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) for tasks such as Automatic Speech Recognition has fostered interest in RNN inference acceleration. Due to the recurrent nature and data dependencies of RNN computations, prior work has designed customized architectures specifically tailored to the computation pattern of RNN, getting high computation efficiency for certain chosen model sizes. However, given that the dimensionality of RNNs varies a lot for different tasks, it is crucial to generalize this efficiency to diverse configurations. In this work, we identify adaptiveness as a key feature that is missing from today’s RNN accelerators. In particular, we first show the problem of low resource utilization and low adaptiveness for the state-of-the-art RNN implementations on GPU, FPGA, and ASIC architectures. To solve these issues, we propose an intelligent tiled-based dispatching mechanism for increasing the adaptiveness of RNN computation, in order to efficiently handle the data dependencies. To do so, we propose Sharp as a hardware accelerator, which pipelines RNN computation using an effective scheduling scheme to hide most of the dependent serialization. Furthermore, Sharp employs dynamic reconfigurable architecture to adapt to the model’s characteristics. Sharp achieves 2×, 2.8×, and 82× speedups on average, considering different RNN models and resource budgets, compared to the state-of-the-art ASIC, FPGA, and GPU implementations, respectively. Furthermore, we provide significant energy reduction with respect to the previous solutions, due to the low power dissipation of Sharp (321 GFLOPS/Watt).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".