MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

OP0251 IMPACT OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE ON SEVERE COVID-19 OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A MULTICENTER STUDY

2022· article· en· W4291186621 on OpenAlexfundno aff
E. Gilbert, G. Figueroa-Parra, M. Valenzuela-Almada, S. Vallejo, M. R. Neville, N. Patel, C. Cook, X. Fu, R. Hagi, G. McDermott, M. Di Iorio, L. Masto, K. Vanni, E. Kowalski, G. Qian, Z. Wallace, A. Duarte-Garcia, J. Sparks

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersManchester Biomedical Research CentreVersus ArthritisLeeds Biomedical Research CentreUniversité de BordeauxUniversity of ManchesterSorbonne UniversitéFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São PauloKarolinska InstitutetInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleDepartment of Health and Social CareUniversidad de GuadalajaraAstraZenecaUniversidade de São PauloUniversité de LilleWellcome TrustEuropean League Against RheumatismMcMaster UniversityTemple UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BordeauxUniversity of OtagoSchool of Medicine, Boston UniversityNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMassachusetts General HospitalBrigham and Women's HospitalPfizer
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineRheumatoid arthritisInterstitial lung diseasePopulationRetrospective cohort studyProportional hazards modelOutpatient clinicHazard ratioLungConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases→Same topicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis→French-language works237,207→