OpenVar: functional annotation of variants in non-canonical open reading frames
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent technological advances have revealed thousands of functional open reading frames (ORF) that have eluded reference genome annotations. These overlooked ORFs are found throughout the genome, in any reading frame of transcripts, mature or non-coding, and can overlap annotated ORFs in a different reading frame. The exploration of these novel ORFs in genomic datasets and of their role in genetic traits is hindered by a lack of software. RESULTS: Here, we present OpenVar, a genomic variant annotator that mends that gap and fosters meaningful discoveries. To illustrate the potential of OpenVar, we analysed all variants within SynMicDB, a database of cancer-associated synonymous mutations. By including non-canonical ORFs in the analysis, OpenVar yields a 33.6-fold, 13.8-fold and 8.3-fold increase in high impact variants over Annovar, SnpEff and VEP respectively. We highlighted an overlapping non-canonical ORF in the HEY2 gene where variants significantly clustered. CONCLUSIONS: OpenVar integrates non-canonical ORFs in the analysis of genomic variants, unveiling new research avenues to better understand the genotype-phenotype relationships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it