MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291414035 · doi:10.3390/chips1020008

Integrated Sensor Electronic Front-Ends with Self-X Capabilities

2022· article· en· W4291414035 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChips · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Food Inspection Agency
KeywordsComputer scienceInterfacingRobustness (evolution)System on a chipIntegrated circuitComputer architectureApplication-specific integrated circuitCMOSEmbedded systemNeuromorphic engineeringElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ongoing vivid advance in integration technologies is giving leverage both to computing systems as well as to sensors and sensor systems. Both conventional computing systems as well as innovative computing systems, e.g., following bio-inspiration from nervous systems or neural networks, require efficient interfacing to an increasing diversity of sensors under the constraints of metrology. The realization of sufficiently accurate, robust, and flexible analog front-ends (AFE) is decisive for the overall application system and quality and requires substantial design expertise both for cells in System-on-Chip (SoC) or chips in System-in-Package (SiP) realizations. Adding robustness and flexibility to sensory systems, e.g., for Industry 4.0., by self-X or self-* features, e.g., self-monitoring, -trimming, or -healing (AFEX) approaches the capabilities met in living beings and is pursued in our research. This paper summarizes on two chips, denoted as Universal-Sensor-Interface-with-self-X-properties (USIX) based on amplitude representation and reports on recently identified challenges and corresponding advanced solutions, e.g., on circuit assessment as well as observer robustness for classic amplitude-based AFE, and transition activities to spike domain representation spiking-analog-front-ends with self-X properties (SAFEX) based on adaptive spiking electronics as the next evolutionary step in AFE development. Key cells for AFEX and SAFEX have been designed in XFAB xh035 CMOS technology and have been subject to extrinsic optimization and/or adaptation. The submitted chip features 62,921 transistors, a total area of 10.89 mm2 (74% analog, 26% digital), and 66 bytes of the configuration memory. The prepared demonstrator will allow intrinsic optimization and/or adaptation for the developed technology agnostic concepts and chip instances. In future work, confirmed cells will be moved to complete versatile and robust AFEs, which can serve both for conventional as well as innovative computing systems, e.g., spiking neurocomputers, as well as to leading-edge technologies to serve in SOCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it