Integrated Sensor Electronic Front-Ends with Self-X Capabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ongoing vivid advance in integration technologies is giving leverage both to computing systems as well as to sensors and sensor systems. Both conventional computing systems as well as innovative computing systems, e.g., following bio-inspiration from nervous systems or neural networks, require efficient interfacing to an increasing diversity of sensors under the constraints of metrology. The realization of sufficiently accurate, robust, and flexible analog front-ends (AFE) is decisive for the overall application system and quality and requires substantial design expertise both for cells in System-on-Chip (SoC) or chips in System-in-Package (SiP) realizations. Adding robustness and flexibility to sensory systems, e.g., for Industry 4.0., by self-X or self-* features, e.g., self-monitoring, -trimming, or -healing (AFEX) approaches the capabilities met in living beings and is pursued in our research. This paper summarizes on two chips, denoted as Universal-Sensor-Interface-with-self-X-properties (USIX) based on amplitude representation and reports on recently identified challenges and corresponding advanced solutions, e.g., on circuit assessment as well as observer robustness for classic amplitude-based AFE, and transition activities to spike domain representation spiking-analog-front-ends with self-X properties (SAFEX) based on adaptive spiking electronics as the next evolutionary step in AFE development. Key cells for AFEX and SAFEX have been designed in XFAB xh035 CMOS technology and have been subject to extrinsic optimization and/or adaptation. The submitted chip features 62,921 transistors, a total area of 10.89 mm2 (74% analog, 26% digital), and 66 bytes of the configuration memory. The prepared demonstrator will allow intrinsic optimization and/or adaptation for the developed technology agnostic concepts and chip instances. In future work, confirmed cells will be moved to complete versatile and robust AFEs, which can serve both for conventional as well as innovative computing systems, e.g., spiking neurocomputers, as well as to leading-edge technologies to serve in SOCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".