MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291427910 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.06189

An Efficient Real-time Data Pipeline for the CHIME Pathfinder Radio\n Telescope X-Engine

2015· preprint· W4291427910 on OpenAlexaff
Andre Recnik, Kevin Bandura, Nolan Denman, Adam D. Hincks, G. Hinshaw, Peter Klages, Ue‐Li Pen, K. Vanderlinde

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2015
Typepreprint
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathfinderComputer scienceRadio telescopeNetwork packetServerField-programmable gate arrayPipeline (software)Bandwidth (computing)SoftwareReal-time computingComputer hardwareOperating systemPhysicsComputer networkAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CHIME Pathfinder is a new interferometric radio telescope that uses a\nhybrid FPGA/GPU FX correlator. The GPU-based X-engine of this correlator\nprocesses over 819 Gb/s of 4+4-bit complex astronomical data from N=256 inputs\nacross a 400 MHz radio band. A software framework is presented to manage this\nreal-time data flow, which allows each of 16 processing servers to handle 51.2\nGb/s of astronomical data, plus 8 Gb/s of ancillary data. Each server receives\ndata in the form of UDP packets from an FPGA F-engine over the eight 10 GbE\nlinks, combines data from these packets into large (32MB-256MB) buffered\nframes, and transfers them to multiple GPU co-processors for correlation. The\nresults from the GPUs are combined and normalized, then transmitted to a\ncollection server, where they are merged into a single file. Aggressive\noptimizations enable each server to handle this high rate of data; allowing the\nefficient correlation of 25 MHz of radio bandwidth per server. The solution\nscales well to larger values of N by adding additional servers.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207