MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291476199 · doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v23i.1409

Research on S2B2C E-commerce Model Based on SWOT Analysis: Taking Yunji as An Example

2022· article· en· W4291476199 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBCP Business & Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Platforms and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWOT analysisBusiness modelBusinessE-commerceValue (mathematics)Sustainable developmentIndustrial organizationPerspective (graphical)The InternetProcess managementMarketingComputer sciencePolitical scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of the Internet industry and the progress of the social economy, the e-commerce industry has brought new opportunities and challenges. E-commerce member is a new form of e-commerce based on four traditional e-commerce modes of B2C, B2B, O2O, and C2C. This paper discusses the application of the S2B2C (SUPPLE TO BUSINESS TO CUSTOM) model in the e-commerce industry. From the perspective of value chain model, this paper discusses the future development direction. It is found that the new e-commerce model of S2B2C paves the way for the arrival of the future C2B era. At the same time, the research also evaluates S2B2C according to the actual situation and puts forward suggestions for sustainable development in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it