MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291535669 · doi:10.14393/ufu.di.2013.29

A poética do ruído em Ricardo Domeneck: intertexto, performance e mídias

2013· dissertation· pt· W4291535669 on OpenAlexaff
Bárbara S. Peixoto

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural, Media, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsMaple Leaf Foods
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsPoetryIntertextualityArtMeaning (existential)Logos Bible SoftwareLiteraturePerforming artsReading (process)The artsAestheticsVisual artsLinguisticsPhilosophyEpistemologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to analyze the "Noise Poetics" which the contemporary poet Ricardo Domeneck proposes in his body of work. Using two reference works which the author considers to be unique and continuous: a cadela sem Logos (a dog without Logos, 2007) and Sons:Arranjo:Garganta (Sounds:Arrangement:Throat, 2009), as well as his online experimentations with video-poems and the oral production of poetry, as a base, it is possible to verify how these noises reveal themselves. The ways of accomplishing this include inter-textual relationships (through direct citations), performance (the presence of the bodies and voices of both the poet and audience), and the use of other modes of media for the publication and dissemination of his work. By discussing the relationships of both poet and tradition and of poet and new meanings formed in the present day, the first chapter analyzes the noise as revealed in the intertextuality created by direct references to artists and to the works within many artistic spheres, such as literature, cinema, plastic arts, and music. It also analyzes their interference in the reader's construction of meaning and in the shift of attention caused by this process. In contrast, the second chapter focuses on the noise from the perspective of the performance and through the value given by Domeneck to oral production and to the body/voice presence of the author and reader/viewer in the process of reading poetry. The third chapter investigates the ways in which the noises accompany the close relationship between Domeneck's poetry and other arts and with the use of other media forms, aside from print, and how these are utilized in the transmission of his poems and as a mantra in their formation. Thus, one can perceive both that this noise will always appear as an element of transcendence and transformation and that current poets, such as Domeneck, will use this resource, since it neither complies to nor accommodates pre-established artistic expectations. Further, it proposes a redefinition of poetic concepts and expectations, to contemporary works in particular. Domeneck's noises, whether as indirect references to important authors and works, the mixing of languages, the fragmented enjabement, the body, the voice and the performance, or even the exploitation of other forms of medial and artistic support, assure a rupture between yesterday and today and between tradition and the new. From that it is possible to adequately form perceptions regarding the context and current needs. Therefore, it renounces all labels that suppress contemporary poetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCultural, Media, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207