Petrology and Sr–Nd isotope geochemistry of Mosonik: a polygenetic phonolitic nephelinite–phonolite volcano located in the North Tanzanian Divergence of the East African Rift
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mosonik, a 3.25 Ma extensively dissected stratovolcano located in the North Tanzanian Divergence of the East African Rift, consists predominantly of phonolite and three types of phonolitic nephelinite distinguished by the presence or absence of amphibole or garnet antecrysts and differing populations of complexly zoned antecrystal and phenocrystal pyroxenes. The antecryst–phenocryst assemblage is typical of hybrid lavas derived by magma mixing. Compositional data are given for all major minerals. Owing to the high modal proportions (30–60 vol. %) of antecrysts and phenocrysts of pyroxene and nepheline plus the hybrid character of the lavas, bulk-rock compositions do not represent those of the parental liquids. Thus, assimilation–fractional crystallization modelling of the bulk-rock major- and trace-element abundances is inappropriate and an unevolved parental magma cannot as yet be defined. Sr–Nd isotopic data for Mosonik and other Older Extrusive Series rocks suggest derivation by partial melting of ancient metasomatized lithospheric mantle with mixing of Sr and Nd from two sources coupled with minor lower crustal contamination, melting being induced by the plume currently impinging on the Tanzanian craton, and representing the initial interaction of the plume with the cratonic lithosphere. In contrast, the Younger Extrusives, as exemplified by Oldoinyo Lengai nephelinite–carbonatite volcanism, could be derived from this ancient metasomatized lithospheric mantle plus a recent plume-derived asthenospheric component and no contamination by crustal material. The isotopically and genetically distinct Natron–Engaruka melilitites are considered to represent direct adiabatic melting of the Tanzanian plume without lithospheric contributions. Carbonatites and melilite-bearing nephelinites also occur at Mosonik but are not considered in this study as they are only a very minor volumetric component of the volcano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".