MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291718005 · doi:10.1190/image2022-3745244.1

Physics-based preconditioned multidimensional deconvolution in the time domain

2022· article· en· W4291718005 on OpenAlexaff
David Vargas, Ivan Vasconcelos, Matteo Ravasi, Nick Luiken

Bibliographic record

VenueSecond International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionPhysicsTime domainDomain (mathematical analysis)Statistical physicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisOpticsMathematicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-Dimensional Deconvolution is a data-driven method that is at the center of key seismic processing applications - from suppressing multiples to inversion-based imaging. When posed in an interferometric context, it can grant access to overburden-free seismic virtual surveys at a given datum in the subsurface. As such, it constitutes an essential processing operation that achieves multiple imaging objectives simultaneously in redatuming or target-oriented imaging: e.g., suppressing multiples, removing complex overburden effects, and retrieving amplitude consistent image gathers for impedance inversion. Despite its potential, the deconvolution process relies on the solution of an ill-conditioned linear inverse problem sensitive to noise artifacts due to incomplete acquisition, limited sources, and band-limited data. Typically, this inversion is performed in the Fourier domain where the estimation of optimal regularization parameters hinders accurate waveform reconstruction. We reformulate the problem in the time domain - long believed to be computationally intractable - and introduce several physical constraints that naturally drive the inversion towards a reduced set of reliable, stable solutions. This allows to successfully reconstruct the overburden-free reflection response beneath a complex salt body from noise-contaminated data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSecond International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & EnergySame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207