Character of mass failures driven by contourite collapse: Examples from offshore Newfoundland, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreviousNext No AccessSecond International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & EnergyCharacter of mass failures driven by contourite collapse: Examples from offshore Newfoundland, CanadaAuthors: Lindsey HenryChristina HamiltonLindsey HenryBP and Christina HamiltonBPhttps://doi.org/10.1190/image2022-3745949.1 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AbstractIn northern Flemish Pass Basin, offshore Newfoundland, Canada, Pleistocene-Miocene contourite drifts have experienced massive (up to 1550 km2) mass failure events, imaged in high detail in a 25Hz 3D seismic survey. The mass transport complexes (MTCs) erode through two adjacent drifts and accumulate in between the drifts. The MTCs are composed of thin slide blocks (15-49m thick) at the head that transform toe-wards into compressional, cohesive debris flows up to 100m thick.Keywords: contourites, mass transport complexes, Newfoundland, Flemish Pass BasinPermalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/image2022-3745949.1FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & EnergyISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2022 Pages: 3694 publication data© 2022 Published in electronic format with permission by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists and the American Association of Petroleum GeologistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 15 Aug 2022 CITATION INFORMATION Lindsey Henry and Christina Hamilton, (2022), "Character of mass failures driven by contourite collapse: Examples from offshore Newfoundland, Canada," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 2397-2401. https://doi.org/10.1190/image2022-3745949.1 Plain-Language Summary Keywordscontouritesmass transport complexesNewfoundlandFlemish Pass BasinPDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".