The Association Between Admission Heart Failure and In-Hospital Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) study showed that admission HF is associated with longer hospital stay and higher mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. No data are available on the effect of heart failure (HF) on the length of cardiac care unit (CCU) stay and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The link between the severity of HF and the in-hospital prognosis is not established. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the unstudied outcomes in HF patients as well as to compare the outcomes across the spectrum of HF presentations. Methods: We studied 210 STEMI patients presenting to a single primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) center in a retrospective cohort pattern. We excluded those who received fibrinolysis, those who had chest pain for more than 24 h and those with previous stents and presenting with stent thrombosis. All the procedures followed the ethical standards of Alexandria University and the Helsinki Declaration. Results: STEMI patients with HF had significantly longer CCU stay (mean value of 3.6 vs. 2.87 days, P = 0.009), higher in-hospital MACE (55% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001) and higher mortality (15% vs. 0.53%, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that HF is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 9.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.66 - 49.9, P = 0.01). The patients with severe HF on admission (Killip III and IV) tended to stay longer in the CCU (4.13 ± 1.89 days vs. 3.25 ± 1.54 days, P = 0.069) and the hospital (5.88 ± 3.09 vs. 4.42 ± 2.47 days, P = 0.077), compared to those with mild HF (Killip II). There was a tendency for a higher incidence of in-hospital MACE (75% vs. 33%, P = 0.068) and mortality (16.7% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.798) in the former group compared to the latter. The differences among HF subgroups did not reach the point of statistical significance though. Conclusions: The presence of HF on the admission of STEMI patients undergoing PPCI is associated with longer CCU stay, higher in-hospital MACE and mortality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".