A escrita religiosa e homoerótica do poeta contemporâneo Waldo Motta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims at analyzing the literary project "sacred eroticism", by contemporary poet Waldo Motta, which was systematized in the work Bundo e outros poemas (Bundo and other poems, 1996), as an expressive response to the social annulment of the poet. The author's condition of homosexuality, poverty and discrimination become the subject of his lyric doctrine edification, in which the sacred elementthe poetrybecomes a space of the homoaffective profane, thus using the poetic and the poetry to promote an "elevation" of homosexuality. In Waldo's poetry, sacred and profane are not separate instances, they inhabit the same placethe anuswhich symbolically represents an alliance made between the self and the supreme beingthe poetry. In the sacredness of the poet's craft, we find an erotic and an profane language, and it establishes a revitalization of exclusion and protest discourses that subvert literary standards in pursuit to position itself poetically in relation to social and emotional problems resulting from a marginalized life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".