MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Absolute Frequency Measurement of the Sr<sup>+</sup> Ion Optical Clock With a Fourfold Uncertainty Reduction

2022· article· en· W4291908858 on OpenAlexaff
P. Dubé, Bin Jian, Marina Gertsvolf

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaserHydrogen maserAtomic clockFlywheelPhysicsMeasurement uncertaintyNoise (video)Atomic physicsIonElectrical engineeringOpticsEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryWe have made an absolute frequency measurement of the electric quadrupole clock transition of the88Sr+ion in June 2017, using a satellite link to the SI second. The measurement uptime was 92 h. The uncertainty of the measurement has been reduced by a factor of four compared to our previous best measurement that had an uptime of 100 h. The lower uncertainty of the measurement reported here is the result of an improved evaluation of the link uncertainties and of a better use of the high stability of the maser flywheel oscillator. The favorable maser noise properties allows the extension of the maser evaluation period over the full 30 days of the Circular T report of June 2017 without significant degradation of the dead time uncertainty between the maser and the optical clock. Avenues to improve future absolute frequency measurements are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS)Same topicAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsFrench-language works237,207