Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genentech and XOMA are collaborating in the development of a humanized monoclonal antibody, hu1124 (anti-CD11a), which has the potential to treat psoriasis and prevent organ transplant rejection. It is currently undergoing phase III clinical trials for psoriasis and phase I/II trials for transplant rejection. A phase II trial in moderate-to severe psoriasis patients was completed in January 1999 and data were initially presented at the Canadian Dermatology Association meeting in Vancouver, BC in July 1999. Following positive results from this trial, a phase III trial in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients was initiated in December 1999. In August 1999, Genentech and XOMA expanded their collaboration to include organ transplant rejection. In March 2000, XOMA and Genentech initiated a phase I/II study of hu1124 in kidney transplant patients. In February 1999, Lehman Brothers predicted the drug had a 30% probability of reaching market. Assuming a successful launch, Lehman Brothers analysts estimated peak sales would occur in 2009 with sales at that time of 100 million USD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.223 | 0.084 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".