Low pH structure of heliorhodopsin reveals chloride binding site and intramolecular signaling pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the microbial rhodopsin family, heliorhodopsins (HeRs) form a phylogenetically distinct group of light-harvesting retinal proteins with largely unknown functions. We have determined the 1.97 Å resolution X-ray crystal structure of Thermoplasmatales archaeon SG8-52-1 heliorhodopsin (TaHeR) in the presence of NaCl under acidic conditions (pH 4.5), which complements the known 2.4 Å TaHeR structure acquired at pH 8.0. The low pH structure revealed that the hydrophilic Schiff base cavity (SBC) accommodates a chloride anion to stabilize the protonated retinal Schiff base when its primary counterion (Glu-108) is neutralized. Comparison of the two structures at different pH revealed conformational changes connecting the SBC and the extracellular loop linking helices A-B. We corroborated this intramolecular signaling transduction pathway with computational studies, which revealed allosteric network changes propagating from the perturbed SBC to the intracellular and extracellular space, suggesting TaHeR may function as a sensory rhodopsin. This intramolecular signaling mechanism may be conserved among HeRs, as similar changes were observed for HeR 48C12 between its pH 8.8 and pH 4.3 structures. We additionally performed DEER experiments, which suggests that TaHeR forms possible dimer-of-dimer associations which may be integral to its putative functionality as a light sensor in binding a transducer protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".