Comparison of moisture susceptibility of Evotherm 3G warm mix asphalt versus hot mix asphalt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Asphalt stripping is a common form of distress caused by moisture that creates a loss of bond between the aggregate and binder. It is thought that the use of warm mix asphalt (WMA) technology could lead to increased moisture susceptibility if the free moisture present in the aggregates does not evaporate at the lower mixing temperatures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the moisture susceptibility of WMA using Evotherm 3G on laboratory-prepared and plant-prepared mixes. The moisture damage potential was evaluated using the TSR (tensile strength ratio), the static immersion test, moisture-induced stress tester, and Hamburg wheel tracking test. Additionally, plant-prepared mixes were also assessed for TSR and rut depth. The results indicated that WMA provided adequate levels of resistance to moisture damage, reduced swelling, and improved coating. Laboratory mixes showed reduced resistance to rutting, but rut depth of plant mixes was similar to that of hot mix asphalt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".