MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292155070 · doi:10.46292/sci21-00032

Metabolic Syndrome in Children With Myelomeningocele and the Role of Physical Activity: A Narrative Review of the Literature

2022· review· en· W4292155070 on OpenAlexaff
Gabrielle Gour-Provençal

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsShriners Hospitals for Children - CanadaUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNarrative reviewMetabolic syndromePhysical therapyMotivational interviewingIntervention (counseling)PopulationPsychological interventionAerobic exerciseGerontologyFamily medicineIntensive care medicineObesityNursingEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The purpose of this review is to describe the current scientific literature on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in children with myelomeningocele and to gain insight into the baseline levels of aerobic fitness, endurance, and strength in this population in order to identify gaps in knowledge, suggest potential primary prevention strategies, and provide recommendations for future studies. Methods: A literature review of articles published in English and French between 1990 and April 2020 was conducted. Results: Obese adolescents with myelomeningocele have an increased prevalence of components of the metabolic syndrome. Children and adolescents with myelomeningocele have decreased aerobic fitness and muscular strength, decreased lean mass, and increased fat mass, all of which, when combined with higher levels of physical inactivity, put them at higher risk of developing metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. Conclusion: Until more research is conducted, addressing weight-related challenges and promoting healthy habits (such as optimal activity levels) could be easily integrated into yearly myelomeningocele clinics. An actionable suggestion might be to systematically weigh and measure children in these clinics and utilize the results and trends as a talking point with the parents and children. The follow-up appointments could also be used to develop physical activity goals and monitor progress. We recommend that the health care practitioner tasked with this intervention (physician, nurse, etc.) should be aware of locally available accessible sports platforms and have knowledge of motivational interviewing to facilitate removal of perceived barriers to physical activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationSame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207