MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292178665 · doi:10.1063/5.0094874

Sparse sensor-based flow estimation with spectral proper orthogonal decomposition

2022· article· en· W4292178665 on OpenAlex
Henrique Gambassi, Paul Ziadé, Chris Morton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEstimatorDynamic mode decompositionSubspace topologyWakeVortexInterpretabilityFlow (mathematics)AlgorithmArtificial neural networkFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceCurse of dimensionalityArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysicsGeometryComputer visionMachine learningMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in developing sensor-based estimators for unsteady flows has become an active area of research over the last decade. One of the challenges in this area is the selection of a low-dimensional subspace that enables the ANN to reconstruct relevant spatiotemporal dynamics in the flow, as both sparsity and interpretability are simultaneously desired. The present study demonstrates the use of a flow-estimation framework based on Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks and the time-domain Spectral Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (SPOD) [Sieber et al., “Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition,” J. Fluid Mech. 792, 798–828 (2016)], which was proposed as an extension to the traditional POD. The two-cylinder flow selected for analysis in this study is referred to as the “flip-flop” regime for exhibiting intermittent changes in the phase alignment of the vortices shed by the two cylinders. This flow has dynamics occurring over a wide range of frequencies, and it was selected to demonstrate the usefulness of SPOD in characterizing the wake dynamics of periodic wake flows and to determine if it can provide a better subspace for training and estimation when compared to POD. It was found that a particular SPOD basis obtained with an empirically determined filter length completely separated the frequency centered phenomena present in the spectrum of the most energetic POD modes into different modes. These new SPOD modes were observed to have a direct relationship with the vortex dynamics in the flow, providing direct access to the antiphase and in-phase flow states. The LSTM neural networks estimation capacities were very similar across all the modal spaces investigated, performing well regardless of whether the frequency content of the modal space used for training and estimation was found superimposed in the spectrum of the most energetic modes (POD) or separated into different modes (SPOD). Further investigation is required to determine if this result holds for turbulent flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it