Abnormal topological parameters in the default mode network in patients with impaired cognition undergoing maintenance hemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The role of the default mode network (DMN) in the cognitive impairment experienced by patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remains unknown. This study tested the hypothesis that the topological architecture of the DMN plays a key role in ESRD-related cognitive impairment. Methods For this study, 43 ERSD patients receiving MHD and 41 healthy control (HC) volunteers matched for gender, age and education underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging examinations. DMN architecture was depicted by 20 selected DMN subregions. Graph theory approaches were applied to investigate multiple topological parameters within the DMN in resting state at the global, local and edge levels. Results Globally, the MHD group exhibited topological irregularities as indicated by reduced values for the clustering coeffcient (Cp), normalized Cp (γ), world-index (σ), and local effciency (Eloc) compared with the HC group. Locally, the MHD group showed greater nodal betweenness in the left retrosplenial cortex (RC) compared with the HC group. At the edge level, the MHD group exhibited disconnected resting-state functional connections (RSFCs) in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) subsystem including the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (VMPC)–left posterior inferior parietal lobule, VMPC–right parahippocampal cortex (PC), and right RC–left PC RSFCs. Additionally, the VMPC–right PC RSFC was positively correlated with the Digit Span Test score and Eloc, and the right RC–left PC RSFC was positively correlated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score and Eloc in the MHD group. Conclusions ESRD patients undergoing MHD showed local inefficiency, abnormal nodal centralities, and hypoconnectivity within the DMN, implying that the functional differentiation and local information transmission efficiency of the DMN are disturbed in ESRD. The disconnected RSFCs in the MTL subsystem likely facilitated topological reconfiguration in the DMN of ESRD patients, leading to impairments of multidomain neurocognition including memory and emotion regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".