Seasonal and decadal variations in absorption properties of phytoplankton and non-algal particulate matter in three oceanic regimes of the Northwest Atlantic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seasonal and inter-annual absorption properties of phytoplankton and non-algal particulate matter were studied in relation to phytoplankton biomass, as indexed by chlorophyll-a concentration, and presence of diatoms, as indexed by fucoxanthin concentration, using a 20-year time series of in situ data collected in the Northwest Atlantic. We found significant differences in the spatiotemporal variations of the bio-optical properties for three oceanic regimes: mesotrophic (Scotian Shelf), oligotrophic (Northwest Atlantic Basin, NAB), and subartic (Labrador Sea). The Scotian Shelf and NAB exhibited similar phenology with the spring and autumn blooms associated with low phytoplankton specific absorption, while only relatively high fucoxanthin concentration occurred in spring. The NAB showed a smaller seasonal variation than the Scotian Shelf in agreement with its oceanic conditions. The Labrador Sea showed a single phytoplankton bloom in spring followed by a continuous decrease in biomass the rest of the year. The relationship between phytoplankton absorption coefficient at 443 nm and chlorophyll-a concentration was consistent with other studies with coefficients that were region-dependent. Absorption by non-algal particulate matter remained between 5% and 60% of phytoplankton absorption with a mean of 15%. The slope of the non-algal particulate absorption varied with seasons and regions and appeared to depend on the trophic status with high values (i.e., up to 0.04) occurring during bloom conditions. We also introduced a new index, the phytoplankton apparent absorption wavelength (PAAW), a wavelength-weighted sum of absorption expressed in nanometers that provides information on the phytoplankton biomass and assemblage in a simple manner. Time series analysis of the PAAW revealed a decrease of this property in spring on the Scotian Shelf, NAB, and Labrador Sea and an increase in autumn on the Scotian Shelf and NAB, suggesting a shift in these ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".